![]() ![]() In terms of file-based syncs, though, I've had some luck with robocopy with multithreading options enabled, but you really have to tweak the underlying storage options (samba parameters, etc) to get metadata access times as low as can be a real pain. Use it to sync with USB drives, networked computers and FTP servers. This feature enhances collaboration by allowing users to keep files and folders synchronized. On the incredibly expensive side, you have things like NetApp/etc, and on the free-if-you-can-support-it side is ZFS, which is what I mainly use.īest practice would still be to have a second form of backup, but that second backup can run for longer periods of time in most cases since it's not your primary backup. AJC Sync is a powerful and easy to use folder compare, file sync and backup software. Enable sync for files and folders in the Files application. ![]() ![]() Either or both base folders may be on remote services. The only really excellent solution I've ever found at that scale has been snapshot-based replication and manage snapshot retention at both ends. In the upper part of the view, specify the Left folder and Right folder involved. "NAS" style approaches (file based) can start to really fall apart at that scale. You can visualise the differences between your data and your backup and choose what will be copied and. I've had to deal with this problem in several cases over the years with absurd numbers of files on a system. FolderSync is a utility to keep your backups up to date. 100+TB and tons of files? The problem with huge (tens+/hundreds+ of millions) numbers of files is the metadata hit, rather than the sheer amount of bytes actually transferred. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |